Web-Mining Defeasible Knowledge from Concessional Statements
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mining common-sense knowledge is a vital problem of artificial intelligence that forms the basis of various tasks, from information retrieval to robotics. There have been numerous initiatives to mine common-sense facts from unstructured data, more specifically, from Web texts. However, common-sense knowledge is typically not explicitly stated in the text, as it is considered to be obvious, self-evident, and thus shared between writer and reader. We argue that certain types of defeasible common-sense knowledge (i.e., knowledge that holds in most but not all cases), in particular, beliefs and stereotypes, tend to appear in text in a particular manner: they are not explicitly manifested, unless the speakers encounter a situation that runs in contrast to their defeasible common-sense assumptions. For example, if a speaker believes that Spain is a very warm country, she may express a surprise when it snows in Bilbao. We further argue that such conceptual contradictions correspond to the linguistic relation of concession (e.g., although Bilbao is in Spain, it is snowing there today) and we present a methodology for extracting defeasible common-sense beliefs (it is not common to snow in Spain) from Web data using concessive linguistic markers. We illustrate the methodology by mining beliefs about persons and we show that we are able to extract new information compared to existing common-sense knowledge bases.
منابع مشابه
Incorporating Defeasible Knowledge and Argumentative Reasoning in Web-based Forms
The notion of forms as a way of organizing and presenting data has long been used since the beginning of the WWW. Web-based forms have evolved together with the development of new markup languages (e.g., XML), in which it is possible to provide validation scripts as part of the form code in order to test whether the intended meaning of the form is correct. However, for the form designer, part o...
متن کاملDefeasible Reasoning in Web-Based Forms through Argumentation
The notion of forms as a way of organizing and presenting data has been used since the beginning of the World Wide Web. Web-based forms have evolved together with the development of new markup languages, in which it is possible to provide validation scripts as part of the form code to test whether the intended meaning of the form is correct. However, for the form designer, part of this intended...
متن کاملArgument Exchange Over the Semantic Web∗
The Semantic Web purports to give computeraccessible meaning to the content of the World Wide Web. The rationale behind this project is to create an environment where all this information could be freely exchanged among diverse entities, yet retaining its intended meaning. Defeasible Logic Programming is a knowledge representation and reasoning formalism that by combining Logic Programming with...
متن کاملTowards the Application of Association Rules for Defeasible Rule Discovery
In this paper we investigate the feasibility of Knowledge Discovery from Databases (KDD) in order to facilitate the discovery of defeasible rules that represent the ratio decidendi underpinning legal decision making. Moreover we will argue in favour of Defeasible Logic as an appropriate formal system in which the extracted principles should be encoded.
متن کاملThe DR-Prolog Tool Suite for Defeasible Reasoning and Proof Explanation in the Semantic Web
In this work we present the design and general architecture of DR-Prolog, a system for defeasible reasoning and proof explanation in the Semantic Web, and the implementation of three different tools that constitute the DR-Prolog Tool Suite: (a) the DR-Prolog API; (b) the DRProlog Web application; and (c) the DR-Prolog desktop application. DRProlog supports reasoning with Defeasible Logic theori...
متن کامل